Math·U·See
 
 
Home
Products:
Curriculum
Materials
How to Use
Placement
Purchase
Free Demo
Online Helps:
Online Drill
Worksheet Generator
Loan Calculator
Investment Calculator
Forum
Downloads
About Us:
FAQ's & Articles
Testimonials
Awards
International
Special Ed
News:
What's New
Event Calendar
Blog
Contact:
Reps
Feedback
Support
Family Resources:
SteveDemme.com
 

A Response to 100 Top Picks for Homeschool Curriculum, from Steve Demme, founder of Math·U·See:

Steve Demme

Since the new book, 100 Top Picks for Homeschool Curriculum,by Cathy Duffy, was released, I have been asked to respond to a few of her comments about our upper level courses. I appreciate her positive insights and observations on our elementary level material. You can tell that Cathy has done her homework and I feel she is right on the money. In the upper level section there are a few statements that give me pause and I would like to take this opportunity to respond to them.

Easier than Most

When describing the Geometry text, she uses the words “easier than most” to describe this course. I happen to like that description very much, and believe it applies to all of our courses. Making math understandable, clear, and “easy” is very important to us and has always been one of our primary goals when teaching. That is why we have employed video instruction and manipulatives. New material is presented concretely so students can “see” math. Not only does math become clear, it becomes enjoyable. May we always be guilty of making math easy!!
P. S. Geometry does have a list of theorems and postulates in Lesson 22. : )

Bird in Head

Algebra 1 was compared to other first year algebra courses and found to “not cover as much territory”. Our aim is to have students focus on the essential topics, and master them, rather than be exposed to other less important material and fail to understand what they are studying. Perhaps you had a similar experience when you were in school. You covered a lot of territory but retained very little of the material you were exposed to. Duffy’s review correctly observes that our Algebra 2 moves more quickly than traditional books. She goes on to say that after a student completes our Algebra 1 & 2 they have covered similar material. Our observation is that not only will they have studied the same “content” but they also will have understood the “concept”. A bird in the head is worth two in the textbook.

PreCalculus, formerly Trigonometry

Several additional lessons have been added to our Trigonometry curriculum to enhance an already successful program. It is now a strong PreCalculus course.

Honors Books

In 2005, our Honors Books were released. These have been developed for the upper levels, beginning with Pre-Algebra and continuing through Algebra 2. These were written for students who want more challenging problems. The material presented in the books, contains new topics as well as more difficult applications of content in the regular curriculum.

Advanced Students

In response to Duffy’s recommendation of Math·U·See for average to slow students, we have a growing file of testimonies from bright students who have excelled with Math·U·See. All of them have gone on to take college courses while still in high school. Their professors have commented on the strong conceptual foundation in math. These young people have benefited from our student-paced program, which teaches abstract concepts concretely. When algebra is presented with manipulatives, students are able to grasp advanced concepts and more quickly. This enables them to move into our upper levels at a younger age. Since we are written for tutors, who can move at the student’s pace, advanced students progress at their own pace and finish our high school course in a timely fashion. As they master a concept, they are free to move efficiently through the material.

Student Paced

What is good for the advanced student is also good for the learner who needs more time to master concepts. Student paced means student paced. If they need additional time and practice, provide them with all the time necessary to produce a confident accomplished math scholar.

If it Works

Parents often appear at our booths at curriculum fairs and tell us how their students are enjoying and understanding math for the first time, their test scores are up, and the teacher finally understands math. Then they say they are thinking of switching from Math·U·See!! When we ask them why, they usually have no answer except their friends are using another program and they are having doubts. Doubts?? The children are learning math, it is becoming their favorite subject, they are progressing nicely, and all are happy, and they are having second thoughts! Beware of peer pressure among parent educators!! Since Math·U·See is working well for your family, stick with it!

Conclusion

Math·U·See is an effective math program that works for students of all ages and learning styles. I am grateful that it is easier than most. What works at the elementary levels is also effective at the upper levels. Try it and you, and your students, will see!!

Steve Demme, for Math·U·See